T1047 – Windows Management Instrumentation:Īdversaries may abuse Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to execute malicious commands and payloads. The Windows command shell (cmd) is the primary command prompt on Windows systems. Be aware that there are methods of bypassing the PowerShell execution policy, depending on environment configuration.Īdversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution. When PowerShell is necessary, restrict PowerShell execution policy to administrators. Use application control where appropriate. It may be possible to remove PowerShell from systems when not needed, but a review should be performed to assess the impact to an environment, since it could be in use for many legitimate purposes and administrative functions.ĭisable/restrict the WinRM Service to help prevent uses of PowerShell for remote execution. M1042 - Disable or Remove Feature or Program: Set PowerShell execution policy to execute only signed scripts. PowerShell is a powerful interactive command-line interface and scripting environment included in the Windows operating system.Īnti-virus can be used to automatically quarantine suspicious files. T1059.001 – Command and Scripting Interpreter – PowerShell:Īdversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution. Users can be trained to identify social engineering techniques and phishing emails. Enabling these mechanisms within an organization (through policies such as DMARC) may enable recipients (intra-org and cross domain) to perform similar message filtering and validation. Use anti-spoofing and email authentication mechanisms to filter messages based on validity checks of the sender domain (using SPF) and integrity of messages (using DKIM). cpl, etc.) that can be used for phishing are necessary for business operations and consider blocking access if activity cannot be monitored well or if it poses a significant risk. Network intrusion prevention systems and systems designed to scan and remove malicious email attachments or links can be used to block activity.ĭetermine if certain websites or attachment types (ex. All forms of phishing are electronically delivered social engineering.Īnti-virus can automatically quarantine suspicious files. Responsible for 5% of all ransomware incidents we observed targeting MSPs and their customers in 2021Īdversaries may send phishing messages to gain access to victim systems.Uses the double extortion method of encrypting files and threatening to leak stolen data.Ransomware-as-a-service that first appeared in June 2021.This page includes supplemental material with a more detailed breakdown of the TTPs and suggested mitigation techniques. What I can say is that on the speed scale from 1-5 where 1 is face spam and 5 is altar telvanni or conscription empire, Defender and Blade seem like they'd slot more into 4-5 decks whereas Seducer would be more at home in 3-4 decks.In the 2022 MSP Threat Report, the CRU identified the top 5 ransomware threats targeting MSPs in 2021 and provided a brief description of each. I would love to talk about Dagon's Seducer in comparison to those two, but I don't have nearly enough experience with the card to give an informed judgment. EB can make that trade less unfavorable because he also nets you 3 health. If your opponent plays a Fighters Guild Recruit against your Hive Defender and you have nothing to kill it, you have no choice but to accept that unfavorable trade. But if you have a strong board, you can force your opponent to choose between disadvantageous trades or giving you extra health because of that monster slay effect.ĮB also has a big advantage over Defender in the matchup against Lethal control. If your board state is poor on T4, it's less helpful than Defender in amending that. I'd actually say Blade is something of a win-more card. Typically when I play Defender, I'm walling out a lane, clearing 2-drops, and also putting a barrier for my opponent's 4-drop. It's more likely to survive trades because of that 1 extra HP and T2-3 cards rarely have 4 health such that you'd prefer EB's increased damage. Hive Defender is easily the better trader. You can Fell the Mighty him, and Fell the Mighty is more meta relevant that it used to be, which is a major downside. It's also immune to Fell the Mighty.īlade is more aggressively statted, while also offering almost all the defensive benefits of Hive Defender. When it comes to Hive Defender, my favorite thing to consider is the deckbuilding aspect with him and Emperor's Blade in decks with access to both cards.ĭefender is more removal resilient because it has more health (meaning you need to empower a card like Channeled Storm more times to one-shot it).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |